您的位置: 首页 » 法律资料网 » 法律法规 »

TRANSFER OF BUSINESSES (PROTECTION OF CREDITORS) ORDINANCE

时间:2024-05-17 00:12:32 来源: 法律资料网 作者:法律资料网 阅读:9921
下载地址: 点击此处下载

TRANSFER OF BUSINESSES (PROTECTION OF CREDITORS) ORDINANCE ——附加英文版

Hong Kong


TRANSFER OF BUSINESSES (PROTECTION OF CREDITORS) ORDINANCE
 (CHAPTER 49)
 Whole document:
  
  rotect creditors on the transfer of businesses, to provide 
for the
  ility of transferees of business, the manner in which such 
liability
  be avoided and for matters incidental thereto and connected
therewith,
  to repeal the Fraudulent Transfers of Businesses Ordinance.
  June 1980]
 1. Short title
  
  Ordinance may be cited as the Transfer of Businesses (Protection 
of
  itors) Ordinance.
 2. Interpretation
  
  In this Ordinance, unless the context otherwise requires--
  eal" includes a motion for a new trial or to set aside a 
verdict,
  ing or judgment;
  iness" means a business, or any part thereof, consisting of a
trade or
  pation (other than a profession) whether or not it is carried on 
with
  ew to profit; "charge" means--
  a debenture within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.
32);
  a mortgage;
  a bill of sale;
  a lien; or
  any document,
  r or pursuant to which a business or any assets thereof are charged
as
  rity for the payment of money or the performance of an obligation,
and
  udes an equitable charge;
  rge-holder" means a person who, under or pursuant to a charge,
and for
  purpose of enforcing payment of any money or for the 
performance of
  obligation, may sell any business;
  e of transfer" means the date on which a transfer takes effect 
or is
  nded to take effect;
  ice of transfer" means a notice of transfer in accordance with
section
  registered charge" means a charge which is registered under--
  the Land Registration Ordinance (Cap. 128);
  the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32);
  the Bills of Sale Ordinance (Cap. 20); or
  any other enactment;
  nsfer" means the transfer or sale of a business, but does not
include-
  the sale of the stock-in-trade of a business in the ordinary
course of
  trade;
  the creation of a charge;
  the transfer of land or any share or interest therein; or
  the transfer of a vessel (or the transfer of any interest or 
share
  ein), other than--
  a vessel to which Part IV of the Shipping and Port Control 
Ordinance
  . 313) applies; or
  a trawler to which Part XII of the Merchant Shipping Ordinance 
(Cap.
  applies; "transferee" means the person to whom a 
business is
  sferred by a transferor; "transferor" means--
  in the case of the sale of a business under or pursuant to a 
charge,
  person whose business has been or is intended to be sold;
  in every other case, the person by whom or on whose 
behalf the
  sfer has been or is intended to be made.
  For the purposes of this Ordinance "transferor" and 
"transferee"
  ectively include a sub-transferor and a sub-transferee.
 3. Transferee of business to be liable for liabilities of trans- 
feror
  
  Subject to this Ordinance, whenever any business is transferred, 
with
  ithout the goodwill thereof, the transferee shall,
notwithstanding any
  ement to the contrary, become liable for all the 
debts  and
  gations, including liability for tax charged or chargeable 
under the
  nd Revenue Ordinance (Cap. 112), arising out of the carrying on
of the
  ness by the transferor.
  Notwithstanding subsection (1), where a part of a 
business is
  sferred (other than the goodwill thereof) and in any
proceedings--
  the transferee would, but for this subsection, be adjudged 
liable
  r this Ordinance for any debts and obligations arising out 
of the
  ying on of the business by the transferor; and
  it is shown to the satisfaction of the court hearing the 
proceedings
  --
  the transferee purchased such part of the business in good faith 
and
  value; and
  at the date of transfer of such part of the business, the 
transferee
  no knowledge (whether actual, constructive or imputed)
  what he was acquiring formed part of a business,
  transferee shall not be liable under this Ordinance for the debts 
and
  gations arising out of the carrying on of the business 
by the
  sferor.
 4. Circumstances in which the transferee's liability ceases
  
  A transferee shall not become liable under section 3 if a 
notice of
  sfer has been given not more than 4 months, and not less than 1
month,
  re the date of transfer and has become complete at the 
date of
  sfer.
  Where a notice of transfer has been given but the notice 
has not
  me complete at the date of transfer, the liability of the 
transferee
  r section 3 shall cease with effect from the date on which the 
notice
  ransfer becomes complete.
  Where a notice of transfer has not been given before or at the
date of
  sfer, the liability of the transferee under section 3 shall cease
with
  ct from the date on which a notice of transfer, which is given 
after
  date of transfer, becomes complete.
  A notice of transfer shall, subject to subsections (5) and (6),
become
  lete upon the expiration of 1 month after the date of 
the last
  ication of the notice in accordance with section 5.
  Subject to subsection (6), in the case of a notice of 
transfer
  rred to--
  in subsection (1), if proceedings are instituted 
against  the
  sferor in respect of any liability of the transferor arising 
before
  notice has become complete and out of the carrying on 
of his
  ness; or
  in subsection (2) or (3), if proceedings are instituted 
against the
  sferee in respect of any liability of the transferee under 
section 3
  ing before such notice becomes complete,
  notice of transfer shall (for the purposes of such proceedings 
only)
  eemed incomplete pending the final determination of such 
proceedings,
  uding all possible appeals, and pending the expiration of all 
periods
  ng which such appeals may be brought.
  Where proceedings are instituted, a notice of transfer shall 
not be
  ed incomplete under subsection (5) unless within 1 month 
of the
  eedings being instituted--
  they are served on the transferor or transferee, as the case may 
be;
  
  written notice that they have been instituted is sent by 
registered
  to the last known address of such transferor or transferee.
 5. Contents of notice of transfer and manner of giving notice
  
  Except in the case of a transfer by way of sale under or pursuant
to a
  ge, a notice of transfer shall contain the following
particulars--
  the full name and address of the transferor;
  the nature of the business and the name or style under which, and 
the
  address at which, it has been carried on during the period 
of 6
  hs immediately preceding the date of transfer;
  the date of transfer;
  the full name and the residential and business addresses 
of the
  sferee;
  if the transferee--
  intends to carry on or is carrying on the business, the full 
address
  e, and the name and style under which, he is carrying it on or
intends
  arry it on; or
  is not carrying on the business and does not intend to carry it
on, a
  ement to that effect; and
  a statement that at the expiration of 1 month after the date of 
the
  publication of the notice pursuant to subsection (3), the 
liability
  he transferee for all the debts and obligations arising out 
of the
  ying on of the business by the transferor shall cease by 
virtue of
  Ordinance unless proceedings are instituted prior to such
expiration.
  In the case of a transfer by way of sale under or pursuant 
to a
  ge, a notice of transfer shall contain the following
particulars--
  the nature of the business, and the name or style under which,
and the
  address at which, it has been carried on during the period 
of 3
  hs immediately preceding the date of transfer;
  the full name and address of the person whose business has been,
or is
  nded to be, transferred by way of sale under or pursuant 
to the
  ge;
  details of the charge under or pursuant to which the transfer by 
way
  ale has been or is to be made, sufficient to enable any 
document
  ting or evidencing the charge to be readily identified and, 
without
  ting the generality of the foregoing, such details shall
include--
  the date when the charge was made, given, executed or 
came into
  tence;
  the consideration for which the charge was executed, made or 
given
  if there was no such consideration, the circumstances in which
it came
  existence;
  ) in the case of a registered charge, the date of the registration 
of
  charge, the title of any enactment under which it was registered 
and
  number or other means of identifying the charge assigned to it 
upon
  stration;
  the date of transfer; and
  the amount of money, payment of which has been secured by the 
charge
  which was owing--
  at the date of the publication of the notice of transfer; or
  if the transfer has already taken effect, at the date of the
transfer
  aking effect.
  Every notice of transfer shall be signed--
  by both the transferor and the transferee, in the case of a 
transfer
  hich subsection (1) applies; or
  by the charge-holder and the transferee, in the case of a transfer 
to
  h subsection (2) applies,
  shall be given by publication in--
  the Gazette;
  any 2 of such Chinese language newspapers circulating in Hong Kong
as
  be approved for the purpose by the Chief Secretary; and (Amended
L. N.
  f 1985; L. N. 242 of 1989)
  ) 1 English language newspaper circulating in Hong Kong which has
been
  pproved.
 6. Right of transferee to indemnity
  
  The transferee shall be entitled to be indemnified--
  by the transferor, except in the case of a transfer by way of 
sale
  r or pursuant to a charge; or
  by the charge-holder, if the transfer is by way of sale 
under or
  uant to a charge,
  all amounts for which the transferee is made liable 
under this
  nance and for which he would not otherwise be liable.
  The amount of such an indemnity may be recovered by civil 
proceedings
  debt or liquidated demand.
 7. Liability of parties not affected
  
  ing in this Ordinance shall relieve or be deemed to 
relieve a
  sferor or transferee, or any person who sells a business 
under or
  uant to a charge, from any liability to which he would 
otherwise be
  ect.
 8. Limitation of liability of transferee
  
  A transferee who in good faith and without preference has 
paid in
  harge or partial discharge of any liability for which he became
liable
  r this Ordinance, and for which he would not otherwise 
have been
  le, an amount which is equal to the value of the business acquired 
by
  at the date on which the transfer took effect, shall not be 
liable
  her under this Ordinance.
  The value of a business acquired by a transferee at the date on 
which
  transfer takes effect shall, until the contrary is proved, be
presumed
  e an amount equal to the amount paid or agreed to be paid (whether 
in
  s of money or by means of any other consideration) for the
acquisition
  he business.
 9. Limitation of time for institution of proceedings
  
  ect to section 6, no action shall be instituted to recover any 
debt
  or to enforce any obligation against any person liable therefor
under
  Ordinance, and for which he would not otherwise have been 
liable,
  than 1 year after the date on which the transfer in respect of 
which
  liability arose took effect.
 10. Saving
  
  Ordinance shall not apply to any transferee where the transfer
  ffected--
  by the Official Receiver or a trustee in bankruptcy;
  by the liquidator of a company in liquidation other than 
voluntary
  idation;
  by the Financial Secretary Incorporated; (Amended L. N. 369 of
1989)
  by the Director of Education Incorporated;
  by the Director of Social Welfare Incorporated;
  by a person selling under or pursuant to a charge which has 
been
  stered for not less than 1 year at the date when the transfer 
takes
  ct;
  pursuant to any order or direction of any court;
  by an executor or administrator; or
  by operation of law.
 11. Repeal and saving
  
  The Fraudulent Transfers of Businesses Ordinance (Cap. 49, 1964 
Ed.)
  epealed.
  Notwithstanding subsection (1), the Fraudulent Transfers of
Businesses
  nance (Cap. 49, 1964 Ed. ) shall continue to apply with respect 
to a
  sfer--
  which took effect; and
  in respect of which notice was given under section 3 
of that
  nance, before the coming into operation of this Ordinance, as if 
this
  nance had not been passed.


关于死刑复核程序的法律思考

姬永福*


【内容提要】死刑复核程序作为现阶段我国刑事诉讼制度中对死刑适用的一种特殊
的监督程序,其存在有其价值基础,但由于人们对其实质的理解存在偏差,在加上
该程序受历史上刑事政策的消极影响以及程序设计本身的一些缺陷,使得理论和司
法实践中出现了许多问题。本文对此分别进行了分析,并提出了改革该程序的一些
思路。
【关键词】 死刑复核; 价值基础; 实质; 强制上诉
一、死刑复核程序存在的价值基础
死刑复核程序是我国刑事诉讼中的一种特殊程序,它的设立是和现代刑罚由报应刑向目的刑的转变,刑罚人道主义和刑罚轻缓化思想的深入人心分不开的。自意大利刑法学家贝卡利亚在其《犯罪与刑罚》中提出废除死刑的主张以来,对死刑的存废问题就成为人们讨论的热点。那种以法律的名义从肉体上消灭罪犯从而弥补其给社会业已造成的创痛之合理性和有效性正越来越受到质疑。目前世界上许多国家已经废除了死刑,保留死刑的国家也在死刑的适用上作了诸多严格的限制我国目前处于社会变革的非常时期,社会矛盾日益增多,恶性犯罪居高不下。所以现阶段暂不宜废除死刑。但限制死刑适用,坚持少杀,慎杀,防止错杀,是符合我国目前国情的一项刑罚政策。而死刑复核程序正是该政策在刑事程序法上的体现。
二、对死刑复核程序实质的理解
对何谓死刑复核程序学理界多有论述,但大多是从与一,二审的比较中说明它的特殊性,并未回答它的实质所在。笔者认为,它与一,二审在适用对象,启动方式等方面的不同,仅仅表现了程序运作上的具体特点,并非其实质的体现。从79年和96年两部刑事诉讼法来看,中级人民法院判出死刑的一审案件,被告人不上诉的,应由高级人民法院复核后,报请最高人民法院核准。高级人民法院判处死刑的一审案件,被告人不上诉检察院不抗诉的,以及由其二审判处死刑的案件均应报请最高人民法院核准。从中我们看到上,下级法院监督与被监督的层际关系,这种层际关系排除了同级法院适用该程序的可能性。保证了死刑案件的质量。所以,死刑复核程序的实质就在于它是一种上级人民法院对下级人民法院的监督程序。在这一特殊的监督程序中,任何一个法院的死刑判决都应该受到来自其上级法院的监督。这种监督的终端就是法律规定的,死刑立即执行案件为最高人民法院,死缓案件为高级人民法院。这样也从实质层面上合理解释了为什么并非所有的死刑案件都要经过该程序。如最高人民法院判处的一审死刑案件或一,二审死缓案件以及高级人民法院一审判处死缓生效案件和二审判处的死缓案件,这些案件判决不经过死刑复核程序并非其绝对正确而不需要经过复核,而是从法院级别设置和核准权的分配上来看,这些判决无法接受来自上级法院的监督。
三、死刑复核程序的发展及现存问题分析
(一)死刑复核程序发展的几个阶段
有学者针对建国以来我国立法对死刑案件核准权的“反反复复”的情况,按照数次“收”和“放”的变化,将其分为几个阶段。这虽然略显表面化,但对于我们了解该程序的历史发展以及对现在出现的问题追本溯源未尝不是一个简便易行的办法。故笔者姑且也将其分为几个阶段来逐一介绍。
第一阶段:建国初到刑诉法颁布前。死刑核准权最早出现在54年《人民法院组织法》中。根据该法11条规定,最高人民法院对高级人民法院作出的死刑终审判决有核准权,高级人民法院对中级人民法院死刑总审判决和当事人未上诉的基层人民法院或中级人民法院的死刑判决有核准权。而1957全国人大四次会议作出决议将死刑核准权统一收归最高人民法院行使。58年最高人民法院又将死缓案件的核准权交由高级人民法院行使。显然,立法者在这一阶段的“收”和“放”的举措都表明其在该程序所要达到的公正和效率两大诉讼目标之间的抉择和倾向。这一阶段的死刑复核程序从总体上来看,监督层次关系明晰,合理且有度。
第二阶段:刑诉法颁布到刑诉法修订前。79年刑诉法和刑法中均对死刑案件的核准权进行了严格控制,规定有最锆院统一行使。后来随着社会治安的恶化,依法需判处死刑案件的增多,为及时高效地核准死刑案件,有力打击恶性刑事犯罪。全国人大常委会分别于1980年和81年两次作出决定,授权各地高级人民法院对部分严重暴力犯罪需判处死刑的案件行使核准权。最高人民法院依此决议进行了授权。1991年-97年为打击日益猖狂的毒品犯罪,最高人民法院又先后授权云南,广东等五省,自治区高级人民法院对部分毒品死刑案件行使核准权。这一时期死刑核准权的变化,体现了在同刑事犯罪作斗争过程中,立法者对诉讼效率的“偏好”。但立法者的“放权”决定似乎只考虑了实体问题而未顾及程序上的协调,使得高级人民法院判处死刑的一审案件如被告人不上诉,检察院不抗诉的,以及二审判处死刑案件均不在经高级人民法院死刑复核程序加以复核。即出现了二审程序吞并死刑复核程序的现象,也就是所谓的“二合一”现象。
第三阶段:新刑事诉讼法施行到现在。96年刑诉法和97年刑法中均未规定最高人民法院在必要时可以下放死刑核准权,依新法优于旧法的原理,可以视为死刑核准权又“重归”最高人民法院。但97年最高人民法院再次将部分死刑案件的核准权授予各地高级人民法院。这样,死刑核准的两极格局仍未改变,该程序在上述案件中名存实亡。
(二)从“合理有度”到“程序紊乱”原因分析
1,从立法到司法的“重实体轻程序”的观念使得在“从重从快”地与犯罪作斗争时,程序正义的理念被置之不顾。
2,立法司法解释的模糊:刑诉修订后,最高人民法院于96年和98年两次作出《关于执行〈刑事诉讼法〉的司法解释》中均回避了这一问题。仅规定:“中级人民法院判处死刑的一审案件,被告人不上诉,人民检察院不抗诉的,上诉期满后3日内报请高级人民法院核准。”但是对被告人上诉,检察院抗诉的死刑案件如何处理则未作规定。
3,程序设计的缺失。死刑复核制度在程序设计上的不足,如审理采全面审,核准没有期限限制等一些不符合诉讼效率原则要求的程序漏洞长期得不到弥补。在恶性犯罪增加,死刑案件急剧上升需要下放核准权来提高效率的情况下,程序发生混乱也就在所难免了。
四、关于死项基本原则刑复核程序的法律思考
(一)理论界对改革死刑复核程序的几种思路
1,取消死刑复核程序,对死刑案件实行三审终审,作为两审终审诉讼原则的例外。具体主张:中级人民法院判处死刑的一审案件,被告人上诉到高级人民法院后,由高级人民法院依二审程序全面审理,死刑判决得到维持后,被告人可继续上诉到最高人民法院。最高人民法院可依上诉范围进行审理而不进行全面审。
2,最高人民法院“收权”:认为由最高人民法院统一行使死刑复核权是解决目前死刑复核程序混乱无序的根本出路。主要理由是经济的发展必然带来社会道德水平的逐步提高,犯罪现象也必然逐渐减少,死刑的适用范围也必将大大缩小。这样,死刑核准权有最高人民法院统一收回,便于统一掌握死刑标准,确保杀的准,杀的少。
3,高级人民法院增设死刑复核庭:这种观点的思路是中级人民法院判处死刑的一审案件进入二审后,经高级人民法院二审终审维持死刑 ,还须再交高级人民法院死刑复核庭进行死刑复核,然后才可生效。
(二)现有改革思路之评析
1,取消死刑复核程序,对死刑案件实行三审终审,在实际操作中难以与二审终审制度协调。我们尚不考虑以三审终审程序代替死刑复核程序有多大合理性。单从与二审终审制的诉讼原则协调来看就值得我们对其提出质疑。例如在中级人民法院判处死刑的一审案件进入二审后,高级人民法院经依法审理认为认定事实没有错误,但适用法律不当或者量刑白当而改判无期徒刑的,甚至作出无罪判决的,此时的案件应适用二审终审直接生效呢,还是应报请最高人民法院核准呢?
2,最高人民法院“收权”并不现实。虽然这种思路在理论上讲并无不妥,同时也符合立法精神,但在司法实践中却不可能性的通。自死刑核准权下放以来,由最高人民法院行使死刑核准权的仅限于危害国家安全案件和重大经济犯罪案件(约占所有死刑案件的百分之十)即便如此,最高人民法院也感力量不足。这从后来最高人民法院又将部分毒品犯罪死刑案件先后下放和各地法院普遍反映经最高人民法院核准死刑的案件核准时间过长(立法上无时限规定)可以窥见端倪。可以相信,在目前刑法扩大适用死刑的犯罪种类和大量死刑案件需要及时核准的背景下,将死刑核准权统一收归最高人民法院必然导致复核效率的低下,进而可能会影响到死刑核准的准确性。
3,高级人民法院内设立死刑复核庭也不不具可行性。这种思路主要是解决程序“二合一”的问题的。但司法实践中,同一死刑案件在同一法院中审理均需由同一审委会讨论决定,另行组成复核庭实际意义不大。同时同一个法院内的一个合议庭报请另一个合议庭复核,似乎同一合议庭也有高低之分,显然不合理。
(三)笔者认为,结合我国刑事犯罪的斗争实践,寻求惩罚犯罪与保障人权,公正与效率兼顾的死刑复核程序并非不可求。
笔者的设想是:明确规定死刑案件核准权分别由最高人民法院和高级人民法院行使,而由高级人民法院核准的那部分死刑案件的一审权宜下放至基层人民法院,而且由基层法院审结后可强制上诉至中级人民法院,由中级人民法院进行二审。这样设想的理由是:
1,死刑核准权分别由最高人民法院和高级人民法院行使,符合我国社会治安现状和审判工作实际。不但是立法上原则性和灵活性的体现,同时也是立足我国刑事犯罪现状和两级法院的工作量的实际而作出的合理分配。
2,基层人民法院行使死刑案件一审权是在不改变刑事诉讼二审终审制的基本格局下改变级别管辖。所以不会导致程序混乱。基层法院依法进行一审,中级人民法院进行二审,高级人民法院进行复核审也是符合死刑复核程序的层际监督的实质。另外,有学者提出83年严打期间死刑案件下放至基层法院后很快即被收回的历史经验表明不宜由审级较低的法院进行死刑案件的一审。笔者则不同意这种看法,理由如下:第一,死刑一审权的短暂下放即被收回主要原因并非基层法院不能保证死刑案件的审理质量,而是“考虑到在立法上未作规定这样简单的放权,非但不能使案件得到及时处理,反而因为增加了层级,拖延了诉讼。”第二,由高级人民法院进行死刑复核的案件,均为“自然暴力型”犯罪,虽然重大,但一般并不复杂。再加上几十年来基层法院审判经验的积累和法官素质的不断提高,死刑案件的审理质量应该还是可以保证的。
3,基层法院判处死刑一审案件,强制上诉至中级人民法院。理由在于:
1)可以对基层法院判处的死刑一审案件查露补缺。增加一次检验把关的机会,保证案件审理质量。
2)既为高级人民法院核准该部分案件奠定可基础,又避免了部分死刑案件若适用三审终审制所带来的审极制度混乱。
3)强制上诉并非凭空臆想,国外也有例证。日本刑事诉讼法359条规定:“检察官,被告人可以放弃申诉或者撤回上诉”但接着在360条之(二)规定:“对于处死刑或者无期监禁判决的上诉,虽有前条规定也不得放弃。”原南斯拉夫刑诉法361条(四)规定:“如果被判处死刑是,被告人不得放弃上诉权,也不得撤消已提出的上诉。”
4)虽然在一定程度上有干涉诉讼当事人之诉权的可能,但从确保审理公正,防止错判角度讲,可以从更深层次保护被告人的权益。这在刑事诉讼法其他制度中也能得到相互映证。如《最高人民法院关于执行〈刑事诉讼法〉若干问题的解释》第36条和第38条确立的对可能被判处死刑的人的强制指定辩护的制度,其背后的立法精神也是如此。


河北省农村计划生育优待办法

河北省人民政府


河北省农村计划生育优待办法


1995年10月19日河北省人民政府令第144号发布


第一条 为促进我省农村计划生育工作的开展,根据《河北省计划生育条例》(以下简称《条例》),结合本省实际,制定本办法。
第二条 本办法适用于本行政区域内符合下列情况的农业户口家庭:
(一)依法实行晚婚、晚育的;
(二)终身只生育一个子女,并领取了《独生子女父母光荣证》的;
(三)计划内生育两个女孩后,夫妻一方按规定实行结扎手术的;
(四)男到有女无儿家结婚落户的。
第三条 各级人民政府要加强对农村计划生育优待工作的领导。各级计划生育主管部门负责组织本办法的实施工作。
农业、教育、民政、劳动、土地、工商行政管理等部门,应当按照本办法的规定做好农村的计划生育优待工作。
第四条 实行晚婚晚育的,享受下列优待:
(一)符合发放宅基地条件的,应当优先审批;
(二)在同等条件下,应当优先照顾招工或者安排在乡镇企业就业;
(三)有条件的地方,可给予适当物质奖励。
第五条 终身只生育一个子女并领取了《独生子女父母光荣证》的家庭,享受下列优待:
(一)自领取《独生子女父母光荣证》之月起,至子女十八周岁止,由所在地的乡(镇)人民政府每月发给不低于十元的独生子女父母奖金或者给予同等价值的物质奖励。经本人同意,也可用同等金额的奖金为其办理农村社会养老保险;
(二)独生子女优先入本乡(镇)、村集体办的托儿所、幼儿园;上小学、初中的,免收杂费;
(三)独生子女参加本省内中考、高考和招工考试,在录取时给予十分的照顾。有条件的地方还可以给予适当奖励;
(四)符合发放宅基地条件的,应当优先审批;
(五)在同等条件下,应当优先照顾招工或者安排在乡镇企业就业;
(六)对生活确有困难的,应当优先发放扶贫款、安排扶贫项目和致富技术培训;符合社会救济条件的,应当优先给予救济;
(七)符合《条例》规定的生育二胎条件,自愿不再生育的夫妻,由所在地的乡(镇)人民政府给予不低于五百元的一次性奖励;
(八)已承包的土地、果园、荒坡、滩涂等,在家庭人口减少对不得收回,由家人继续承包;
(九)省人民政府规定的其他奖励。
第六条 计划内生育两个女孩的家庭,且夫妻一方实行结扎手术的,享受下列优待:
(一)实行结扎手术后,所在地的乡(镇)人民政府应当给予适当经济补助或者由村民委员会组织帮耕帮收;
(二)为夫妻办理农村社会养老保险。投保总额应当不低于五百元,可由集体和个人分担,其中集体负担部分应当不低于百分之五十(从照顾二胎生育费中列支入);
(三)符合发放宅基地条件的,应当优先审批;
(四)在同等条件下,应当优先照顾招工或者安排在乡镇企业就业;
(五)优先安排致富项目和致富技术培训;
(六)省人民政府规定的其他奖励。
第七条 任何人不得歧视男到有女无儿家结婚落户。鼓励男到有女无儿家结婚落户,并给予下列优待:
(一)在同等条件下,应当优先照顾招工或者安排在乡镇企业就业;
(二)符合发放宅基地条件的,应当优先审批;
(三)有条件的地方,应当及时解决男方的口粮田和责任田;
(四)符合生育二胎条件的,优先发给二胎生育证;
(五)优先安排扶贫项目和致富技术培训;
(六)省人民政府规定的其他奖励。
第八条 本办法第二条规定的家庭从事个体经营,符合审批条件的,工商行政管理部门应当优先办理营业执照;土地管理部门应当优先审批办理征、占地手续。
第九条 本办法规定给予奖励的,其资金来源:
(一)照顾二胎生育费;
(二)计划生育事业费;
(三)计划外生育费;
(四)乡(镇)统筹中用于计划生育的费用。
第十条 凡执行本办法,在计划生育优待工作中作出显著成绩的单位和个人,由计划生育主管部门或者同级人民政府给予表彰、奖励。
第十一条 凡违反本办法,未经批准又计划外生育或者非法收养子女的,由所在地的乡(镇)人民政府或者村民委员会停止优待并追回已享受的奖励,同时依照《条例》的有关规定予以处罚。
第十二条 凡违反本办法,拒不落实优待规定的,当事人可向县(含自治县、县级市,下同)人民政府法制机构举报,经县人民政府法制机构会同计划生育和有关主管部门调查核实,由县人民政府责令限期落实。
第十三条 被举报单位和人员对当事人打击报复的,由有关主管部门或者所在单位或者行政监察机关视情节轻重,对其主要负责人和直接责任者分别给予批评教育或者行政处分。
第十四条 本办法由河北省计划生育委员会负责解释。
第十五条 本办法自一九九五年十一月一日起施行。